Observation Report 2/3/2011

Another night when the seeing was far from great, not helped by having a breakdown truck parked nearby with all the lights flashing whilst I was setting up, and then someone wandering through the adjoining field at about 10pm flashing a very bright torch around, all set off by the sheep on the nearby cricket pitch setting off all the security lights on the pavilion! I had new toys again though, in the guise of a set of Revelation (allegedly the same as GSO) eyepieces, that I wanted to try out.

However, having decided that some of my targets from last time weren’t going to be worth spending time on, I perhaps unwisely picked M76 for my first target. Had I looked at Stellarium and realised that I was going after a tiny planetary nebula with an apparent magnitude of 12, perhaps I’d have looked for something else. Nonetheless I spent a long time hunting from star to star, switching up and down eyepieces to get different magnifications, until I found what I had no other choice than to identify as the nebula in question, though I wasn’t able to identify any detail. It and HIP8053 complete what appears to me as a “pawprint” asterism with φ-Perseii, 2 Perseii, HIP8771 and HIP8598.

Thinking I’d try something a little easier I opted to give M103 a try, but completely failed to locate it for no reason that I could understand, so moving up the magnitudes a little more I moved on to M52 which I located as being near the crossing points of lines drawn between Shedir and Caph in Cassiopeia and β-Cephi and ι-Cephi. Finding the cluster needed 25x magnification and once found opened up to give a good view at around 50x.

After this success I found M31 again thinking that I might look for M32 or M110, but I really couldn’t make enough detail out to say that I could see them. By this time the cloud cover had increased to the point where very little sky was visible so I decided to call it a night, taking my Messier total up to twenty-four.

And the EPs? I’m very pleased with them. The 32mm makes a great EP for scanning the sky and the views through them all are clean and sharp. A proper try out really needs somewhat better seeing than was on offer on this particular night though.

Posted in Astronomy | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Observation Report 26/2/2011

Despite not being a great night in terms of seeing, this was the first time I’d been able to give the ST102 a good try out so I wasn’t going to miss the opportunity.

Initially I skipped a few Messier targets in Andromeda and Cassiopeia because the sky wasn’t sufficiently clear, but eventually managed to locate M34 in Perseus. The wind was rising and began to make viewing tricky from my usual site in the field in front of the house, so I decided to leave things for a while to see if they’d improve.

An hour or so later there was still a strong breeze, so I moved into the lee of the house where the view of the sky is far more restricted. By this time my original targets had set or moved sufficiently far to be obstructed by trees, so I moved around to targets to the east and north-east. First up was M65 which I’d tried unsuccessfully to find with the ST80. This time I found it surprisingly easily, getting both M65 and M66 into the same frame in a V shaped group, two elliptical fuzzy patches.

Pleased by finding these two I scanned the sky between Virgo, Leo and Coma Berenices for other Messier objects, but failed to find any after fifteen minutes or so search, so took a break and attempted M64, the Black Eye Galaxy instead, which proved to be far less elusive. I’ve not yet worked out why this is so-named, and the view didn’t really enlighten me.

It was getting towards 1am by now and the temperature was dropping, so I made one final attempt to locate another failure in the ST80 — M51, the Whirlpool Galaxy. After some hunting around off Alkaid this time I found it, though sadly it wasn’t clear enough to see more than a fuzzy egg-shaped blob.

Not unexpectedly I guess, the ST102 is just like a “big brother” to the ST80, but I’m very pleased that I’ve been able to find objects with it that I struggled to see with the 80mm version.

Posted in Astronomy | Tagged , | Leave a comment

DIY Small-Scale Anaerobic Digestion (part one)

Fans of the 1970’s BBC comedy series “The Good Life” will remember that Tom and Barbara had an electricity generator in the cellar that was powered using pig manure. What may be surprising is that it’s based on a fundamentally sound idea. Under the right conditions organic matter can be broken down by bacteria-like organisms (“composted”, if you will) to produce a mixture of carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulphide and methane. The CO2 and H2S isn’t too hard to extract, leaving methane which can be burned for cooking, heating, or in a generator. Small-scale digesters that do this aren’t at all uncommon in India and Africa where there are suitable “raw materials” and are often little more than one steel drum inverted inside another filled with the waste.

I’ve thought it would be fun for a while to try to build an AD unit myself and feed it chicken manure, kitchen waste and whatever else I could get my hands on for free. A friend gave me his old 2,500 litre oil tank (thanks Mark) and in fits and starts I’m making progress.

The first thing to do was to provide a large-bore pipe through which the tank could be filled and emptied. I decided to use 100mm soil pipe for this and fitted it into the tank using some flanges intended for large aquarium installations. I’ll seal them in place with silicon sealant.

The next problem is that ideally the contents of the tank needs stirring on a regular basis, but without letting all of the gas escape. As some form of heating is required to get the methane-producing beasties to work, I decided to use the pump circuit to swirl the contents of the tank around. I fitted a pipe from the original tap fitting into an old central heating pump and connected that to the bottom of the coil in a disused copper hot water cylinder. The top of the coil then goes into a second pipe that feeds back into the tank half-way up side, but where the bulkhead fitting goes back into the tank I’ve fitted a bend inside so the flow is back into the tank around the circumference. Hopefully that will start a stirring motion inside. The idea is that the hot water cylinder will be filled with hot water, initially heated by an immersion element, but subsequently perhaps by coolant from a generator and act as a large reservoir of heat to warm the contents of the tank, rather like a domestic heat store hot water system.

The filler cap has also been replaced with a clear perspex sheet allowing me to see inside (and which will seal tight to the top of the tank) and I’ve stood everything on a wooden platform on top of a couple of sheets of 50mm thick insulating material.

This is as far as I’ve reached so far. The next stage is probably to seal everything up and see if it can produce any gas at all, but before I do that I’ll built a cover of polythene sheeting to trap air around everything to try to retain some more heat. I’ll probably also lag the tank with a few layers of loft insulation, or perhaps even bubble-wrap.

Here’s what it looks like so far:

Posted in Environment, Projects, Smallholding | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Solar wax melter

Solar wax melters are available commercially and there are a fair few designs about on the web. Here’s one I made a couple of years ago.

I started with the tray that the frames would sit in. I had some steel sheet lying around that I’d removed from our oil boiler before it went to the tip, thinking it would come in handy one day, so I cleaned that up and drew out a “net” for a tray 18″ wide, 18.5″ long at the sides down to 20.5″ in the middle and with 3″ high sides. This was actually the largest I could make it given the sheet I had available, but actually worked out fairly well as I was planning to make something I could stack four National brood frames or six Nation super frames in. I made tabs on the edges that were to be joined and was intening to pop-rivet them once the sheet was folded up, but in the end they were welded instead. Out of an off-cut of the sheet I folded up a spout and riveted that to the base of the tray, then sprayed the entire tray with flat black Hammerite paint and placed some mesh against the walls above the spout to filter out the worst of the rubbish. This is the finished tray:

To house the tray I built an open-top wooden box from 12mm marine ply with internal dimensions 18.5″ wide, 29.5″ deep and 5.5″ high. At 45° at one end I added a shelf for the wax collector to stand on. I found the tray wasn’t quite high enough for the spout to reach over the collector, so added a few scraps of ply to the frame to push the tray further up, and a couple of screws hold the tray in place at the top of the box when it’s tilted up. I would liked to have used glass for the top of the box, but with two children running about the place it made more sense to use a scrap of acrylic sheet. To hold the sheet in place at the top I used a length of timber into which I’d cut a rebate with a router, and another length without a rebate at the bottom:

First tests showed the air temperature at the top of the box to reach 90C on a warm summer day and the melter has worked excellently for a couple of years. It does need a little tidying up now. A coat of preservative would probably be sensible as well as a retaining strap to hold the perspex tight to the walls of the box, as small gaps mean bees get interested in getting inside and die very quickly if they do.

The other major change I intend is to make a metal or plastic “lip” to go under the bottom edge of the perspex so rain will be carried off to the sides. I didn’t think this would initially be a problem because I was intending to use it where there’s an overhang that prevents rain reaching it, but that’s near the front door and the box does tend to attract bees which distresses visitors, so it now sits out in the elements.

Generally though I’m very pleased with it, especially given that it cost me nothing but time and a few scraps of material that I had lying around.

Posted in Bee-keeping, Projects | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Creating a bespoke landscape for Stellarium

I use Stellarium on several PCs and laptops to help me plan what I’m going to attempt to observe and for finding objects in the sky when I can’t find them from other pictures or star maps. It’s a great program and I heartily recommend it. It allows the user to select a number of landscapes to render the stars against and, if you can work out how, it also lets you create your own. I found a few sets of instructions on how to do so using Windows, but I’m a UNIX/Linux person so needed a way that would work for me (though as I’m just using hugin and the gimp, this may well work on Windows, too). Here’s what I did.

First take a sequence of shots with a camera from the viewpoint you’ll be using to create a panorama. Ideally choose a day on which the sky is a uniform colour because we’ll want to get rid of it later. If the sky is the same colour as anything else in the image then things will get a bit more awkward later. You need a full 360° with plenty of overlap in each shot — a third is good. I started with north at one edge of the first photograph, because I know exactly which direction that is, but it’s not a major problem wherever you start. Try to keep the horizon in roughly the same place in each photo; it probably helps with lining things up later to keep it in the middle of the shot. You don’t need a particularly good camera. I used an Ixus 40 in manual mode so I could force the same exposure settings for each photograph, although I suspect that it may help to leave auto white balance on. I also took the images in a portrait orientation rather than landscape because I wanted as much of the ground in the shot as possible. My pictures were taken without a tripod or other rest. I suspect it may help to use one, but quite a few things can be fixed later on. I usually have my scope in a field, so I took an extra shot of the grass to use to fill in any missing ground, but if you’re in a garden or on a patio, a few shots from around your feet might be useful just to fill in any gaps later on. This gave me 17 panorama shots of around 2200×1700 pixels to work with. We’ll need them smaller later on, but for the moment transfer them to the PC and keep them in the original format and resolution because the software will be pulling useful information out of them.

The next stage was to stitch all of the photographs together into a panorama. For this I used the “hugin” panorama creator which is available as a package for Ubuntu (my current desktop OS of choice). I loaded the panorama images in from the “Assistant” tab and then skipped straight to the “Control Points” tab which is where you run through the photographs creating control points (no surprises there) that allow hugin to join all the photographs together. If you’re not that familiar with hugin that’s no problem. Neither am I. And despite that it even managed to get the images the correct way up. Select the first image from the drop-down on the left and the second image from the one on the right and pick out a few points (I try to get five as far apart as possible) that appear in both images. Make sure the “auto fine tune” and “auto estimate” options are selected at the bottom right of the window. Click on the first in one image and adjust the position of the cross to get it on an exact spot you can identify, then click on the second image and move the cross to exactly the same place. If you get the cross in roughly the right place, hugin can often locate the exact position for you. Once you’re happy, click “Add” and move on to the next point. After the first point is in place, hugin will usually suggest where it thinks subsequent ones will be, which makes life far easier. When you’re happy with these two images, click on the right arrow between the two drop-downs of image names to move on to the next photograph in the set and repeat the process until they’re all done. Do create control points to link the last image back to the first one.

Once you’ve selected all your control points, move to the “Optimiser” tab and click “Optimise Now!”. At this point you can see roughly what you’ve got by clicking on the “Fast Preview Panorama” icon. If you find the horizon is very wavy then you can go to the “Move/Drag” tab in the preview and use the “Straighten” icon to try to sort that out. You can also display the control points and see how well they fit to see if perhaps adding more would help.

Next choose the “Exposure” tab, chose the “Low Dynamic Range” preset and click “Optimise Now!” on this page, accepting the default number of points per image. This may take a few seconds to run depending on the number of images. Apply the results.

Finally for hugin, go to the “Stitcher” tab, chose an equirectangular projection and click the “Calculate Field Of View” and “Calculate Optimal Size” buttons, and then “Stitch Now!” and choose a filename for the panorama image. This may take a few minutes to create.

Once the image has been created, load it into gimp. We want the final image to be 2048×1024 (Stellarium apparently requires the image dimensions to be a power of two, in a width:height ratio of 2:1 and as the supplied Mars landscape is 2048×1024 I took my lead from that), so the first thing to do is to scale the current image to be 2048 pixels wide. We’ll deal with the height in a moment. Use the Image->Scale Image menu to set the horizontal size to 2048 pixels and leave the sizes linked so the image is scaled vertically to match.

Now select Image->Canvas Size, break the link between width and height leaving width at 2048 and set the height to 1024. Also click on “Centre” and select “Resize All Layers”, followed by “Resize”. You should now have an image with the horizon centred somewhere around 500 pixels high. If it’s way out then it may be necessary to move it by selecting most of the image, cutting it and pasting it back in appropriately.

Next use the “select area by colour” tool to select an area of the sky, and cut it from the image using “ctrl-X”. Do this until you’ve got rid of as much sky as you want. If you find your sky colour is the same as parts of the image then you may need to tweak their colour a little, or use an alternative method for selecting the areas you want to remove such as selecting areas freehand. The “select by colour” method does make it really simple to remove sky visible through other objects such as trees though.

Finally, you’ll probably find you have a gap where your panorama doesn’t come down to the bottom of the image. I used my grass shots, resized by the same factor as the panorama and pasted them into this image, but you might be able to use the clone tool or paste in a whole sequence of images to fill that area.

Once you’re done, save the image as a PNG. Create a new directory called $HOME/.stellarium/landscapes/my_landscape and copy the PNG file to it. In that directory you also need to create a file called landscape.ini similar to this:

[landscape]
name = My Landscape Name
author = My Name
description = My description
type = spherical
maptex = landscape.png
angle_rotatez = 90

[location]
planet = Earth
latitude = +00d00'00"
longitude = -00d00'00"W
altitude = 125

Choose the altitude that’s correct for you, and obviously set the correct name for your landscape file in the maptex field. Now you should be able to start stellarium up and find your landscape listed with the others. Select it and save your settings. You’ll probably find first time around that your panorama isn’t aligned correctly with the compass. You can change the angle_rotatez setting from 0 to 359 to shift the image around to the right place. The latitude and longitude don’t need to be correct unless you want to use the “use associated planet and position” under the landscape tab when you load the new landscape into Stellarium.

Posted in Astronomy | Leave a comment

Lunar 100 map with blue markers

I discovered a couple of nights ago that with my new red torch it wasn’t actually possible to read the red markers on my Lunar 100 map. So, I’ve made a new version with the markers in dark blue, which I can read with the red torch. It’s not the best solution in the world as I’ve had to mangle the original PDF, but I think it will work for me.

In the event that anyone else would like to use it, here it is.

Posted in Astronomy | Tagged | Leave a comment

Observation report 15/2/2011

After almost a full day of pouring rain, the skies cleared in the late evening and the seeing was excellent. The moon was bright enough to cast crisp shadows and to illuminate the smoke from one of our chimneys as it rose straight upwards.

Given the brightness of the moon there seemed little point spending time attempting to view anything else so I decided to attempt a few features on the Lunar 100 list. First up was the Copernicus crater, easily found but perhaps would have been better a couple of days early when the illumination was more oblique. It wasn’t as bad as some of the features towards the eastern limb though, where most detail was lost in the brightness. A short hop north-west took me to another crater, Aristarchus, and then back over to the east to see the impact rays across Mare Crisium from Proclus.

At 50x magnification the fractured floor of the Gassendi crater was just about visible, but needed observing for some time for the details to resolve. Sinus Iriuum with its missing south-eastern rim was easy to see.

I spent some time trying to find the straight wall running south from about 18°S 8°W, but couldn’t see it at all, again probably due to the angle of lighting and whilst I could see the Petavius crater, it’s floor features weren’t visible to me for the same reason.

I upped the magnification to around 80x and was rewarded with a fantastic view of Schroter’s Valley and of the different surface textures in Mare Serenitatis after which I went looking for the Alpine Valley leading up to Mare Frigoris. It took some time to pick that out and then once I’d seen it I couldn’t believe it had been so difficult to find. It’s described as a “graben”; I had to look up what that means. The best description I can come up with is something like a rift valley.

Posidonius and Fracastorius were very clear as was the Aristarchus Plateau, but after some searching I was unable to identify Pico to my satisfaction. It also took me some time to find the Hyginus Rille before I realised I’d been staring right at it for several minutes.

With time getting on I decided I couldn’t stay out much longer, so finished by finding the Archimedes crater and the oblique impact features at Messier, Messier A and Schiller. Just on the bright side of the terminator and still partially in shadow, Schiller stood out strongly, looking very impressive.

By this time Saturn was about 25° above the horizon and I couldn’t really call it a night without a quick viewing. It was time well-spent as the image was far sharper than a few nights previously. I tried pushing the magnification up to 250x using a barlow, but couldn’t achieve focus. It’s probably asking too much of the ST102 anyhow and the barlow is only the cheap and nasty one that was supplied with my ST80, so I wasn’t expecting much. I do have a much better one arriving shortly, so I’ll try again at around 170x next time the seeing is good.

Posted in Astronomy | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Focus motor drive for Startravel 80 & 102 Review

One of the problems with the ST80 and ST102 on the EQ1 mount is the amount of “wobble” when changing focus, which not only takes a while to settle down afterwards, but makes it more difficult than it need to be actually determine when the scope is in focus in the first place. I put up with the problem for a while, but when someone mentioned in passing that Skywatcher have a motorised focus drive, I thought I’d give it a try. I bought mine from First Light Optics, but they’re available from many different suppliers, often misleadingly called an “autofocuser”.

The drive arrived as a kit of parts, some of which weren’t necessary for my scope(s), including the motor, controller, battery, cable, two mounting brackets, four screws for retaining the mounting plate, two knurled and slotted screws for attaching the motor to the mounting plate, a plastic “universal joint” type drive connector, an Allen key, a length of self-adhesive velcro and a metal connector which appears to have an O-ring in the open end that was already fitted to the motor output shaft. This clearly wasn’t intended to fit anything I was going to use it for, so I had to remove it (with some difficulty — it was quite stiff even after I’d removed the retaining grub screw completely). Oh, and an A4 sheet of instructions which, whilst OK, weren’t brilliant. I assume the larger mounting bracket is for some of the other scopes that the kit fits and I didn’t use the four retaining screws because the existing ones held the mounting bracket I used without any problems.

The first job is to remove one of the focusing wheels, by removing the screw in the centre and then just easing it off. I’ve fitted this kit to both my ST80 and ST102 and whilst the ST80 wheel came off easily, the ST102 was very stiff and needed a certain amount of carefully levering to remove it:

With the wheel removed the two screws nearest that end of the focusing shaft can be removed from the plate covering the pinion wheel and the motor drive mounting bracket refitted with the same screws. I did them up just tight enough to hold the bracket in place without slopping around so I’d be able to move it into the correct position to fit the motor drive:

I fitted the plastic connector onto the motor next. The shaft has a flat on it for the grub screw to bear on so orientation matters whereas the focusing shaft doesn’t and the other end of the connector will go on in any orientation. However, it’s worth aligning the connector before putting it over the focusing shaft to allow easy access to the two grub screws for tightening them onto the shaft:

With the motor connected I connected the motor housing to the mounting bracket and tightened up the screws on the bracket itself. Before connecting everything up the battery needs to be fitted into the controller. I found there to be almost no free space around the battery for the connector cables and couldn’t get the battery compartment cover closed with the battery in place, so ended up undoing the four screws on the back of the controller to allow the cover to be put in place, then screwed them back down:


Finally, connect up the cable — either way around seems fine — and test it.

I was concerned that I’d find using the controller to focus the scope rather than the focus knob a nuisance, but actually as long as I keep the controller somewhere it’s easy to find without taking my eye from the eyepiece when I need to, it’s fine, and the entire process of focusing is far easier because the image stays beautifully steady. Learning which button moves the focus in which direction and which way you need to turn the speed controller to make the movement faster or slower takes a while to get the hang of, but it’s no different from getting used to the slow motion controls or the clutch locks on the RA/dec axes. It also helps if the cable is fixed to the scope body somewhere to stop its weight dragging the focuser end of the scope down when the clutch locks are released.

I found one additional problem with the ST80. Without the motor drive the scope would only balance in the rings if it was as far forward as possible, with the screws attaching the scope tube to the focuser housing tight up against the rear scope ring. With the motor fitted the scope wouldn’t quite balance without additional weight at the front of the tube.

All in all I’m very happy with the improvement the motor drive has made. A more rigid mount would also solve the problem, I’m sure, but this is a very acceptable alternative until I can justify spending that kind of money

Posted in Astronomy | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Cider Apple Pressing 2010

Behind our house are a small number of cider apple trees around twenty-five years old. Three of these I have identified as Yarlington Mill, two are Dabinett, four are, I’m fairly sure, Somerset, and the remaining three I have not been able to identify, though they’re definitely Jersey-type apples. Yarlington Mill and Dabinett are pretty good cider varieties. The Somerset trees are prolific, but don’t produce particularly good quality juice.

The last couple of years there haven’t really been enough apples to be worth pressing, but this year I managed to collect around 40 sacks full. Pretty much all of these (which I estimate to be in the region of 700 to 800kg in weight) came from the Yarlington Mill and other Jersey type trees. At the start of November I got to work pressing them using my Vigo crusher and home-built bottle jack-driven press.

By the end of November I’d pressed around 600kg of apples to produce in the region of 300 litres of juice which I’ve split between two 220 litre barrels in the workshop. I also added a couple of dozen litres of juice from some Bramley apples to try to raise the acidity a little as all the others are bittersweets. To kick off the fermentation I also added some cider yeast. Unfortunately the remaining apples froze solid (the temperature did get down to -10C at some points) and by the time it was possible to press them they were little more than mush.

Due to the very cold weather throughout December (the coldest in 100 years, I’m sure it was announced on the news) the fermentation has been exceptionally slow. I’m hoping it will pick up again as the weather starts to warm up as we reach the end of winter.

Posted in Cider-making, Smallholding | 2 Comments

UK light pollution map

Someone pointed me at an excellent interactive UK light pollution map the other day, apparently done as an overlay on Google Earth. It’s quite shocking to think that all those bright areas represent wasted fuel, wasted energy and, especially in the current economic climate, wasted money.

I am lucky in that having spent a good fifteen years living in several of the red areas of the map I now live in one that doesn’t even show up on the map, although there appears to be someone a mile or so across the valley who’s doing his level best to change that.

Posted in Astronomy, Environment | Leave a comment